Comparison of Piezo Motor Types

Motor TypeMotion PrincipleRelative ForceHolding Without PowerSpeedPrecision (Resolution)Repeatability (Closed Loop)Pitch/Yaw Stability
Inertial (Stick-Slip)Friction-based stick/slip motionLow–MediumHighLow–Medium~5 nm to 50 nm±20 nm to ±200 nmModerate to Poor (±25–100 arcsec)
Ultrasonic PiezoStanding-wave resonant motionMediumLowHigh~1 nm to 10 nm±10 nm to ±50 nmGood (±10–50 arcsec, depends on guide)
Piezo LEGS® (Walking)Sequential piezo-actuated stepsHighHighMedium<1 nm possible±1 nm to ±10 nmExcellent (±1–10 arcsec with flexures)

Technical Notes

Repeatability

  • Defines a motor’s ability to return to the same target position after repeated motion cycles.
  • Essential in systems requiring stable and predictable positioning, such as microscopy and semiconductor alignment.
  • Optimal performance is achieved through closed-loop feedback utilizing high-resolution encoders.

Precision (Resolution)

  • Depends on step size and drive electronics.
  • Sub-nanometer resolution is possible in Piezo LEGS and ultrasonic systems with proper feedback.
  • Inertia motors have coarser steps due to stick-slip dynamics.

Pitch/Yaw Stability

  • Refers to unintended angular deviations during linear motion (rotations around lateral and vertical axes).
  • Important in applications involving optics, scanning, or submicron alignment.
  • Flexure-guided designs offer minimal pitch/yaw error—especially in Piezo LEGS motors.

Design Factors That Influence Performance

  • Mechanical Guidance: Flexures > linear bearings > unguided systems
  • Load Symmetry: Off-axis or uneven loading increases angular error
  • Drive Electronics: Affects smoothness, responsiveness, and noise
  • Feedback Systems: Capacitive or interferometric encoders provide optimal control